NERVE is live across local, private and approved-cloud deployments. Book an evaluation

AIC Intelligence Suite

One suite, two responsibilities. NERVE supplies. CORTEX interprets.

One suite, two responsibilities. NERVE supplies. CORTEX interprets.

NERVE is the Intelligence Data Fabric: it acquires sources, preserves the original bytes, normalises everything into one information contract and makes it searchable. CORTEX is the governed intelligence lifecycle: it takes that information and turns it into assessed, releasable product. The boundary between them is a published service contract, not a bundle.

NERVE is the Intelligence Data Fabric: it acquires sources, preserves the original bytes, normalises everything into one information contract and makes it searchable. CORTEX is the governed intelligence lifecycle: it takes that information and turns it into assessed, releasable product. The boundary between them is a published service contract, not a bundle.

Both products available now

Where the line sits

One product gets the information right. The other decides what it means.

One product gets the information right. The other decides what it means.

Acquisition is kept separate from assessment on purpose. The record of what was collected stays independent of any later judgement about it, and either product can be adopted on its own.

Information infrastructure

NERVE

Owns everything up to the point where information becomes searchable and citable.

Acquires approved sources, from archives and devices to repositories, feeds and streams.

Preserves the original bytes and records a hash so byte identity can always be re-checked.

Normalises decoded content into one canonical model, with the Original, Canonical and Derived layers kept distinct.

Publishes typed records with lineage, so every result resolves back to accepted bytes.

Carries the dataset handling rule with every record and filters retrieval by the searching account’s authorisation.

Intelligence lifecycle

CORTEX

Owns everything from a stated requirement through to a released, reviewable product.

Captures direction and requirements, then tasks collection against them.

Assesses source reliability, lineage independence and identification risk before corroboration is claimed.

Applies structured analytical technique, explicit assumptions and recorded challenge.

Produces reports with exact-span annotation that never overwrites the original.

Controls release and feedback under separate permissions from collection.

Why the split matters

NERVE never interprets. It does not grade a source, assert that two records describe the same person, or decide whether something is significant. Those are CORTEX decisions, made under separate permissions and recorded separately from the acquisition evidence.

The interface

What crosses the boundary.

What crosses the boundary.

CORTEX consumes NERVE through the same published service contracts any other authorised consumer uses. There is no private channel between the two products.

CORTEX consumes NERVE through the same published service contracts any other authorised consumer uses. There is no private channel between the two products.

Typed records

The canonical model

Documents, messages, media, records and events arrive as typed records sharing one common envelope, so CORTEX reads a message from a mailbox and a row from a database through the same fields.

Lineage

Citation back to bytes

Records carry the acquisition they came from and the processing that produced them. An annotation made in CORTEX can therefore be traced to an exact span of the exact accepted original.

Handling

The rule travels with the record

The dataset’s purpose and handling rule are attached to each derived record, so downstream analysis in CORTEX inherits the same constraint rather than re-declaring it.

Authorisation

Filtered before counts are built

Retrieval is filtered by the requesting account’s authorisation before results, counts and facets are assembled, so unauthorised material never shapes a CORTEX view. Broad administrative permission does not automatically grant protected content access.

Reprocessing

Improvements propagate

When extraction improves, NERVE rebuilds derived records from the retained original. Citations stay stable, so CORTEX products made earlier remain resolvable after reprocessing.

Failure state

Partial is visible, not silent

A job that completes as Partial is reported as Partial. CORTEX sees which items failed, so coverage gaps are an input to assessment rather than an unknown.

Running them together

How the two are connected.

How the two are connected.

01

Register NERVE as a holdings source

CORTEX is pointed at NERVE through the published retrieval contract. No bespoke export, no parallel copy of the holdings.

CORTEX is pointed at NERVE through the published retrieval contract. No bespoke export, no parallel copy of the holdings.

02

Agree the record contract

Field names, types and the common envelope are fixed before integration, so a change in a source format does not become a change in the CORTEX interface.

Field names, types and the common envelope are fixed before integration, so a change in a source format does not become a change in the CORTEX interface.

03

Carry identifiers and lineage through

CORTEX keeps the NERVE record identifier on everything it derives. A matching identifier is treated as a matching identifier, not as proof that two records describe the same person.

CORTEX keeps the NERVE record identifier on everything it derives. A matching identifier is treated as a matching identifier, not as proof that two records describe the same person.

04

Enforce handling at query time

Authorisation is applied by NERVE on every request. CORTEX does not hold a shadow copy that could be read outside the rule the dataset was acquired under.

Authorisation is applied by NERVE on every request. CORTEX does not hold a shadow copy that could be read outside the rule the dataset was acquired under.

05

Keep products resolvable over time

Because the original is retained and citations are stable, a CORTEX assessment written a year ago can still be checked against the bytes it was based on.

Because the original is retained and citations are stable, a CORTEX assessment written a year ago can still be checked against the bytes it was based on.

What neither product claims

The limits are stated, on both sides of the line.

The limits are stated, on both sides of the line.

A hash proves bytes, not people

A hash match confirms that two files are byte-identical. It does not confirm who created them, when, or why.

A matching identifier is not an identity

Two records sharing an identifier are two records sharing an identifier. Deciding they describe the same person is an assessment made in CORTEX, recorded as such.

A location observation is not presence

A recorded location is an observation attached to a record. Concluding that a person was there is a separate analytical step with its own confidence.

Environment and accreditation are shared

Both products run inside an environment you control. Hosting, network boundary and accreditation remain a shared responsibility between AIC and the operating organisation.

Adoption

Each product stands on its own.

Each product stands on its own.

NERVE on its own

Run NERVE where the problem is getting scattered holdings into one searchable, citable, governed place. It serves your existing tools through the same service contracts, with no requirement to adopt an analytical workflow.

CORTEX on its own

Run CORTEX where the problem is the intelligence lifecycle itself: direction, collection, assessment, product and controlled release. It can consume sources other than NERVE.

Next step

Start with the information layer.

Start with the information layer.

Most organisations begin with NERVE, because an assessment can never be better than the holdings underneath it. Bring a representative sample of your own sources and we will plan an evaluation around them.

Most organisations begin with NERVE, because assessment is only as good as the holdings underneath it. Bring a representative sample of your own sources and we will plan an evaluation around them.